Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Nemotron 4 340b Instruct
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads 34.3 to 10.2.
- Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-06-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 35.2 (#228)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1209 |
Reasoning Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 23.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1202 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 34.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1216 |
Knowledge Nemotron 4 340b Instruct leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 32.0 (#216)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1171 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1206 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1214 |
| LMArena French | — | 1197 |
| LMArena German | — | 1192 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1148 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1219 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1195 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 63.1 (#232)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1203 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 37.1 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1225 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 4 340b Instruct: 42.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 4 340b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1225 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1203 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1214 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Nemotron 4 340b Instruct?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Nemotron 4 340b Instruct better for coding?
Nemotron 4 340b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 4 340b Instruct has 17.