Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Nemotron 3 Super in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Nemotron 3 Super leads 37.6 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is WeirdML: 7.1% for Claude 2.1 and 38% for Nemotron 3 Super.
- Nemotron 3 Super has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 39.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-03-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.08 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.45 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nemotron 3 Super leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.9 (#153)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | 38% |
| SciCode | — | 36% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1403 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 213.9 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Nemotron 3 Super: 17.9 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 15.4% |
| CritPt | — | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1386 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Nemotron 3 Super leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Nemotron 3 Super: 37.6 (#95)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 60.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1381 |
Knowledge Nemotron 3 Super leads
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Nemotron 3 Super: 38.2 (#136)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1397 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 48.6 (#139)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1356 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1430 |
| LMArena French | — | 1404 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1417 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 71.4 (#149)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1347 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 41.5 (#134)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1362 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Nemotron 3 Super: 56.1 (#135)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Nemotron 3 Super |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1378 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1369 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Nemotron 3 Super?
Nemotron 3 Super is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Nemotron 3 Super better for coding?
Nemotron 3 Super scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Nemotron 3 Super share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Super has 21.