Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2-Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Pro leads 39.5 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1433 |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.17 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1457 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1447 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1478 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1456 |
| LMArena French | — | 1469 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1457 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1445 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1455 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1456 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.