Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2-Omni
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2-Omni leads 39.1 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), MiMo-V2-Omni: 43.3 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), MiMo-V2-Omni: 29.7 (#88)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1445 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.1 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1430 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), MiMo-V2-Omni: 40.5 (#118)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1449 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 38.6 (#63)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1228 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 51.8 (#102)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1465 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1399 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1317 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1434 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.2 (#66)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1428 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#76)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1442 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.4 (#87)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
MiMo-V2-Omni is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.3 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.