Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 36.8 to 10.2.
- MiMo-V2.5 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 43.4 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1469 |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1450 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1436 |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1460 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1468 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1416 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1434 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1445 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and MiMo-V2.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.