Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
NVIDIASummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads 28.8 to 9.6.
- Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 31.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 9 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 29.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1025 |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 19.1 (#245)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1047 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat leads
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.8 (#223)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1072 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 28.9 (#265)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1064 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 54.5 (#274)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1061 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 30.4 (#283)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 998 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat: 31.8 (#278)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1098 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1058 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat better for coding?
Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.3 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Llama2 70b Steerlm Chat has 9.