Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Grok Build 0.1
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 42.5 to 25.8.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 35.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 25.8 (#322), Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90)
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 20.6 (#216), Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.22 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 9.6 (#309), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.5 (#287), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Grok Build 0.1?
Grok Build 0.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 25.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.