Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs GPT-6 Sol

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

GPT-6 Sol OpenAI

61.8

Rank #12 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-6 Sol in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-6 Sol leads 87.2 to 10.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 100% for GPT-6 Sol.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and GPT-6 Sol specifications
Claude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.261.8
Released2023-11-212026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$10
Results tracked745

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-6 Sol leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GPT-6 Sol: 60.1 (#11)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
DeepSWE—68.8%
FrontierCode—49.3%
LMArena WebDev—1688
SciCode—57.6%
WeirdML7.1%—
LMArena Coding—1447
ALE-Bench—2,462

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 37.2 (#36)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
APEX-Agents—54.3%
GDP.pdf—26.4%
Vending-Bench 2—14,428

Reasoning GPT-6 Sol leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GPT-6 Sol: 74.0 (#9)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
DTBench51%97.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27162.72
ARC-AGI-2—89.6%
NYT Connections (extended)—90.1%
ARC-AGI-1—95.5%
CritPt—30.9%
EBR-Bench—53.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1418
Mystery Game Puzzles—56%
LMCA—59.1%
ForecastBench54.2—

Math GPT-6 Sol leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GPT-6 Sol: 87.2 (#7)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%100%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—89.8%
FrontierMath Tier 4—90%
ProofBench—83%
LMArena Math—1402

Knowledge GPT-6 Sol leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GPT-6 Sol: 64.8 (#15)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
GPQA Diamond33%94.3%
SimpleQA Verified—60.7%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—6.5%
LMArena Expert—1439
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 47.6 (#10)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Vision—1245
Blueprint-Bench 2—36.9%
Furniture Assembly—58.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 50.5 (#118)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Non-English—1385
LMArena Chinese—1405
LMArena French—1410
LMArena German—1390
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1341
LMArena Russian—1401
LMArena Spanish—1384

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 74.5 (#94)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Instruction Following—1412

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 43.1 (#108)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Longer Query—1411

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-6 Sol: 71.9 (#18)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-6 Sol
LMArena Text—1395
LMArena Creative Writing—1378
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2125
LMArena Multi-Turn—1412

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-6 Sol?

GPT-6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 61.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-6 Sol better for coding?

GPT-6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 60.1 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-6 Sol share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-6 Sol has 45.

Related comparisons

Go deeper