Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs GPT-4.5

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and GPT-4.5 in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where GPT-4.5 leads 32.6 to 10.2.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.9% for Claude 2.1 and 37.8% for GPT-4.5.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and GPT-4.5 specifications
Claude 2.1GPT-4.5
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Noometry Index25.237.2
Released2023-11-212025-02-27
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked742

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
WeirdML7.1%39.4%
Aider Polyglot—44.9%
LiveBench Coding—75.2%
LMArena Coding—1396

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
Cybench—17.5%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27136.74
ForecastBench54.261.7
ARC-AGI-2—0.8%
SimpleBench—34.5%
ARC-AGI-1—10.3%
EnigmaEval—3.2%
LiveBench Reasoning—71.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1403
DTBench51%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—64.3%
LiveBench—69%

Math GPT-4.5 leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%37.8%
LiveBench Math—69.3%
LMArena Math—1412
MATH Level 5—78.6%

Knowledge GPT-4.5 leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
GPQA Diamond33%68.7%
Humanity's Last Exam—5.4%
Confabulations—13.6%
LMArena Expert—1394
MMLU73.5%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
LMArena Vision—1195
VPCT—45%

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
LMArena Non-English—1413
LMArena Chinese—1421
LMArena French—1418
LMArena German—1457
LMArena Japanese—1416
LMArena Korean—1392
LMArena Russian—1419

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
LiveBench Instruction Following—72.3%
LMArena Instruction Following—1404

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
Fiction.LiveBench—63.9%
LMArena Longer Query—1406

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1GPT-4.5
LMArena Text—1417
LMArena Creative Writing—1394
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1258
LMArena Multi-Turn—1444
LiveBench Language—61.5%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than GPT-4.5?

GPT-4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or GPT-4.5 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GPT-4.5 share?

5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.5 has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper