Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where GLM-4.5V leads 37.4 to 10.2.
- GLM-4.5V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 39.8 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1334 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1354 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1353 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1298 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1304 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and GLM-4.5V share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.