Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemini 4 Argon leads 73.9 to 10.2.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 56.5 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2026-09-30 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Gemini 4 Argon: 62.0 (#9)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1678 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 55% |
| SciCode | — | 61.8% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1550 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 49.2 (#8)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 82.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 13,718 |
Reasoning Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Gemini 4 Argon: 44.2 (#47)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 27.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1548 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Gemini 4 Argon: 73.9 (#17)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| ProofBench | — | 99% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1536 |
Knowledge Gemini 4 Argon leads
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Gemini 4 Argon: 43.9 (#89)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1553 |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 46.5 (#14)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 54.4% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 60.3 (#1)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1523 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1610 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1537 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1497 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 80.1 (#2)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1538 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 47.6 (#15)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1549 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Gemini 4 Argon: 71.4 (#19)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Gemini 4 Argon |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1534 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1531 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1557 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Gemini 4 Argon?
Gemini 4 Argon is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Gemini 4 Argon better for coding?
Gemini 4 Argon scores higher on coding benchmarks: 62.0 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Gemini 4 Argon share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 4 Argon has 21.