Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Falcon-180B
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation InstituteSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2023-09-06 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | 112.13 |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1007 |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Falcon-180B: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 73.5% | 70.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1047 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2.1: —, Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1013 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Falcon-180B?
Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Falcon-180B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.