Model comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Codestral
Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AISide by side
| Claude 2.1 | Codestral | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 25.2 | 30.6 |
| Released | 2023-11-21 | 2024-05-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.90 |
| Results tracked | 7 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Codestral leads
Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Codestral: 27.3 (#321)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 11.1% |
| WeirdML | 7.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 41.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.5% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 137.78 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 73.8% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.9% |
Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads
Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Codestral: 19.8 (#251)
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 32.5% |
| DTBench | 51% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.27 | — |
| ForecastBench | 54.2 | — |
Math Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.9% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Codestral: —
| Benchmark | Claude 2.1 | Codestral |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33% | — |
| MMLU | 73.5% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2.1 better than Codestral?
Codestral is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude 2.1 or Codestral better for coding?
Codestral scores higher on coding benchmarks: 27.3 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Codestral share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Codestral has 7.