Model comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Claude 3 Opus

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.

Claude 2.1 Anthropic

25.2

Rank #345 Reported

Claude 3 Opus Anthropic

29.5

Rank #310 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude 2.1 scores higher in 1 category and Claude 3 Opus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Claude 3 Opus leads 24.5 to 15.4.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 33% for Claude 2.1 and 47.2% for Claude 3 Opus.

Side by side

Claude 2.1 and Claude 3 Opus specifications
Claude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index25.229.5
Released2023-11-212024-02-29
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked746

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 26.2 (#327), Claude 3 Opus: 32.9 (#267)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
WeirdML7.1%19.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.5%
LiveBench Coding—38.6%
LMArena Coding—1264
BigCodeBench Complete—57.4%
HumanEval+—77.4%
MBPP+—73.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 24.6 (#116)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
Cybench—10%
METR Time Horizons—29.5%

Reasoning Claude 2.1 leads

Claude 2.1: 21.4 (#221), Claude 3 Opus: 14.6 (#324)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
DTBench51%61.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index119.27126.91
ForecastBench54.258.4
SimpleBench—23.5%
Chess Puzzles—5%
EnigmaEval—0.8%
LiveBench Reasoning—40.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1245
LiveBench Data Analysis—57.9%
LMCA—17%
LiveBench—49.2%
WinoGrande—88.5%

Math Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 10.2 (#315), Claude 3 Opus: 14.8 (#299)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.9%4.7%
LiveBench Math—43.6%
LMArena Math—1273
MATH Level 5—37.5%

Knowledge Claude 3 Opus leads

Claude 2.1: 15.4 (#292), Claude 3 Opus: 24.5 (#267)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
GPQA Diamond33%47.2%
MMLU73.5%84.6%
SimpleQA Verified—12.6%
Confabulations—22.7%
LMArena Expert—1223

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 27.1 (#116)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Vision—1023

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 41.4 (#207)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Non-English—1258
LMArena Chinese—1248
LMArena French—1275
LMArena German—1258
LMArena Japanese—1204
LMArena Korean—1187
LMArena Russian—1280
LMArena Spanish—1246

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 64.1 (#228)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LiveBench Instruction Following—63.9%
LMArena Instruction Following—1248

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 38.2 (#202)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Longer Query—1259

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 2.1: —, Claude 3 Opus: 47.2 (#213)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 2.1Claude 3 Opus
LMArena Text—1262
LMArena Creative Writing—1235
LMArena Multi-Turn—1275
LiveBench Language—50.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 2.1 better than Claude 3 Opus?

Claude 3 Opus is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.5 to 25.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Claude 2.1 or Claude 3 Opus better for coding?

Claude 3 Opus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 26.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Claude 2.1 and Claude 3 Opus share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2.1 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3 Opus has 46.

Related comparisons

Go deeper