Model comparison

Claude 1.3 vs Grok 4.6

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 1.3 Anthropic

—

Unranked

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Side by side

Claude 1.3 and Grok 4.6 specifications
Claude 1.3Grok 4.6
ProviderAnthropicxAI
Noometry Index—56.9
Released2023-04-182026-08-12
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—500K
Max output—500K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked249

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
DeepSWE—67.5%
FrontierCode—48%
CursorBench—41.4%
LMArena WebDev—1617
FrontierSWE—25.3%
SciCode—56.5%
WeirdML—67.3%
LMArena Coding—1465
ALE-Bench—1,508

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
APEX-Agents—65.3%
GDP.pdf—17.2%
Vending-Bench 2—9,047

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
ARC-AGI-2—67.1%
SimpleBench—75.9%
NYT Connections (extended)—80%
ARC-AGI-1—87.5%
CritPt—19.7%
Chess Puzzles—40%
EBR-Bench—30.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1447
Mystery Game Puzzles—34%
DTBench—97.3%
LMCA—48.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.44

Math Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—66%
FrontierMath Tier 4—31.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—99.2%
ProofBench—51%
LMArena Math—1423

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
GPQA Diamond—94%
SimpleQA Verified—49.3%
LMArena Expert—1467
MMLU77%—
TriviaQA86.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
LMArena Vision—1263
Blueprint-Bench 2—33.2%
Furniture Assembly—40%
LMArena Document—1452

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
LMArena Non-English—1420
LMArena Chinese—1480
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1431
LMArena Japanese—1376
LMArena Korean—1397
LMArena Russian—1422
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
LMArena Instruction Following—1431

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
LMArena Longer Query—1454

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Grok 4.6
LMArena Text—1428
LMArena Creative Writing—1428
LMArena Multi-Turn—1425

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 1.3 better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 1.3 and Grok 4.6 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 1.3 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper