Model comparison

Claude 1.3 vs Claude Fable 5.1

Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Claude 1.3 Anthropic

—

Unranked

Claude Fable 5.1 Anthropic

68.5

Rank #2 Confirmed

Side by side

Claude 1.3 and Claude Fable 5.1 specifications
Claude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
ProviderAnthropicAnthropic
Noometry Index—68.5
Released2023-04-182026-09-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—128K
Input $ / M tokens—$10
Output $ / M tokens—$50
Results tracked250

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 70.5 (#2)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
FrontierCode—50.9%
CursorBench—51.8%
LMArena WebDev—1753
FrontierSWE—56.3%
SciCode—63.1%
WeirdML—92.9%
LMArena Coding—1523
MirrorCode—73.3%
ALE-Bench—2,143

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 50.8 (#5)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
APEX-Agents—68.6%
Remote Labor Index—17.9%
GDP.pdf—29.6%
Vending-Bench 2—5,422

Reasoning Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 76.7 (#5)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
ARC-AGI-2—90%
NYT Connections (extended)—90%
ARC-AGI-1—97.5%
CritPt—31.1%
Chess Puzzles—47%
EBR-Bench—57.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1526
Mystery Game Puzzles—58%
DTBench—97.6%
LMCA—65.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—165

Math Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 89.5 (#3)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—90.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—87.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—100%
LMArena Math—1519
FrontierMath Erdős—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 69.3 (#5)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
Humanity's Last Exam—46.5%
SimpleQA Verified—70.8%
LMArena Expert—1528
MMLU77%—
TriviaQA86.7%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 54.1 (#4)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Vision—1319
Blueprint-Bench 2—41.9%
Furniture Assembly—70%
LMArena Document—1513

Multilingual Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 59.5 (#2)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Non-English—1509
LMArena Chinese—1589
LMArena French—1532
LMArena German—1495
LMArena Japanese—1565
LMArena Russian—1525
LMArena Spanish—1503

Instruction Following Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#6)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Instruction Following—1515

Long Context Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 46.8 (#19)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Longer Query—1524

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Claude 1.3: —, Claude Fable 5.1: 79.3 (#1)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkClaude 1.3Claude Fable 5.1
LMArena Text—1511
LMArena Creative Writing—1507
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—2162
LMArena Multi-Turn—1492

Frequently asked questions

Is Claude 1.3 better than Claude Fable 5.1?

Claude Fable 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#2); Claude 1.3 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Claude 1.3 and Claude Fable 5.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 1.3 has 2 scored results on Noometry and Claude Fable 5.1 has 50.

Related comparisons

Go deeper