Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.2

Rank #84 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #64 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.8 27B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.8 27B leads 50.3 to 41.0.
  • Qwen3.8 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.8 27B specifications
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.245.3
Released—2026-08-14
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.99
Output $ / M tokens—$1.49
Results tracked2128

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.0 (#122), Qwen3.8 27B: 50.3 (#42)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Coding14131487
LMArena WebDev—1592
SciCode—46.6%

Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 32.8 (#64), Qwen3.8 27B: 31.5 (#71)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Hard Prompts14241459
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)—54.5%
CritPt—5.4%
DTBench—88%
LMCA—41.4%
Surface Evolver Bench—45%
Epoch Capabilities Index—149.38

Math Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 35.8 (#134), Qwen3.8 27B: 35.7 (#139)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Math14071453
ProofBench—16%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.7 (#131), Qwen3.8 27B: 40.9 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Expert14001482
Confabulations16.6%—

Multimodal Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.9 (#54), Qwen3.8 27B: 40.5 (#36)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Vision12431270

Multilingual Too close to call

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 53.1 (#72), Qwen3.8 27B: 54.0 (#54)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Non-English14191431
LMArena Chinese14561504
LMArena French14471468
LMArena German14241435
LMArena Japanese14061392
LMArena Korean13971389
LMArena Russian14291421
LMArena Spanish14351444

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.2 (#102), Qwen3.8 27B: 75.8 (#54)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Instruction Following14031436

Long Context Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#104), Qwen3.8 27B: 44.3 (#66)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Longer Query14131448

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.8 (#68), Qwen3.8 27B: 65.9 (#41)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.8 27B
LMArena Text14291441
LMArena Creative Writing14061382
EQ-Bench Creative Writing15011671
LMArena Multi-Turn14541443

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen3.8 27B?

Qwen3.8 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Qwen3.8 27B better for coding?

Qwen3.8 27B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 41.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.8 27B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 27B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper