Noometry

Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.8

Rank #82 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #42 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 62.4 to 38.6.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.851.5
Released—2026-05-19
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked2133

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Coding14131498
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts14241483
SimpleBench—70.4%
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.68

Math Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Math14071490
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Expert14011488
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
Confabulations16.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), Qwen3.7 Max: —

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English14191474
LMArena Chinese14571530
LMArena Russian14291484
LMArena French1446—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following14031460

Long Context Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query14131482

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Max leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text14291476
LMArena Creative Writing14051449
LMArena Multi-Turn14541481
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1501—
EQ-Bench 4—1110

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 41.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper