Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.8

Rank #82 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 27B Alibaba (Qwen)

42.2

Rank #117 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 27B leads 52.4 to 39.2.
  • Qwen3.6 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.6 27B specifications
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.842.2
Released—2026-04-22
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked2111

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.6 (#122), Qwen3.6 27B: 39.1 (#163)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
SciCode—37.3%
LMArena Coding1413—

Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 33.8 (#71), Qwen3.6 27B: 25.0 (#153)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
CritPt—0.9%
Chess Puzzles—22%
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Mystery Game Puzzles—7%
DTBench—78.1%
LMCA—34.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.5

Math Qwen3.6 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.6 (#134), Qwen3.6 27B: 48.5 (#62)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—35.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math1407—

Knowledge Qwen3.6 27B leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.2 (#137), Qwen3.6 27B: 52.4 (#63)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
GPQA Diamond—85.9%
Confabulations16.6%—
LMArena Expert1401—

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 39.6 (#58), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 52.9 (#76), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Non-English1419—
LMArena Chinese1457—
LMArena French1446—
LMArena German1423—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1396—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1434—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.0 (#107), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Instruction Following1403—

Long Context Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#107), Qwen3.6 27B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.6 (#72), Qwen3.6 27B: 50.3 (#181)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen3.6 27B
LMArena Text1429—
LMArena Creative Writing1405—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1501—
EQ-Bench 4—1026
LMArena Multi-Turn1454—

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen3.6 27B?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 42.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Qwen3.6 27B better for coding?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.6 versus 39.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen3.6 27B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 27B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper