Model comparison

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 OpenAI

43.2

Rank #84 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.7

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads 35.8 to 15.3.
  • Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications
Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.229.7
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 41.0 (#122), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—45%
LMArena Coding1413—
BigCodeBench Complete—52.3%

Reasoning Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 32.8 (#64), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark75%—
Chess Puzzles—0%
LMArena Hard Prompts1424—
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52

Math Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 35.8 (#134), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.4%
LMArena Math1407—
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 leads

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.7 (#131), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—46.1%
Confabulations16.6%—
LMArena Expert1400—

Multimodal Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 38.9 (#54), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Vision1243—

Multilingual Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 53.1 (#72), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Non-English1419—
LMArena Chinese1456—
LMArena French1447—
LMArena German1424—
LMArena Japanese1406—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Russian1429—
LMArena Spanish1435—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 74.2 (#102), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1403—

Long Context Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 43.1 (#104), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1413—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326: 62.8 (#68), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkChatgpt 4o Latest 20250326Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
LMArena Text1429—
LMArena Creative Writing1406—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1501—
LMArena Multi-Turn1454—

Frequently asked questions

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Chatgpt 4o Latest 20250326 has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper