Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs phi-3-medium 14B
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads 33.0 to 9.1.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.3 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 8K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.2 (#252), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1161 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 21.4 (#198), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1156 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 30.8 (#204), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1168 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 8b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.0 (#197), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1153 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.3 (#237), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1180 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1181 | — |
| LMArena German | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1197 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.4 (#248), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1155 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#231), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1192 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.2 (#245), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1168 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than phi-3-medium 14B?
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.