Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b vs GLM-4.5V
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
CohereSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5V leads 52.5 to 39.0.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 34.9 | 39.8 |
| Released | — | 2025-08-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 64K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.60 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.80 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.8 (#252), GLM-4.5V: 39.5 (#155)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1160 | 1347 |
Reasoning GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 22.4 (#197), GLM-4.5V: 27.4 (#119)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1156 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 59.8% |
Math GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.3 (#203), GLM-4.5V: 37.4 (#159)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1168 | 1354 |
Knowledge GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 33.6 (#201), GLM-4.5V: 37.5 (#156)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1153 | 1353 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.5% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: —, GLM-4.5V: 34.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1154 |
Multilingual GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#242), GLM-4.5V: 44.6 (#177)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1180 | 1303 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1181 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1197 | 1298 |
| LMArena German | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1336 |
Instruction Following GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 60.1 (#253), GLM-4.5V: 69.2 (#175)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1155 | 1311 |
Long Context GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 36.1 (#236), GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#171)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1191 | 1304 |
Writing & Preference GLM-4.5V leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 8b: 39.0 (#250), GLM-4.5V: 52.5 (#170)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 8b | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1185 | 1333 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1168 | 1295 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1332 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b better than GLM-4.5V?
GLM-4.5V is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.8 to 34.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 8b or GLM-4.5V better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 8b and GLM-4.5V share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 8b has 15 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5V has 15.