Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs StarCoder 2 3B
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has enough public results to be ranked (#221); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASide by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 36.3 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2024-02-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), StarCoder 2 3B: 33.5
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 21.4% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 27.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 88.76 |
| WinoGrande | — | 57.1% |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 21.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 34.2% |
| MMLU | — | 36.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | — |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), StarCoder 2 3B: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | StarCoder 2 3B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than StarCoder 2 3B?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has enough public results to be ranked (#221); StarCoder 2 3B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or StarCoder 2 3B better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.8 versus 33.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and StarCoder 2 3B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 3B has 7.