Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads 42.4 to 34.3.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.3 (#227), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1130 |
Reasoning C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 22.3 (#183), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1127 |
Math Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 31.4 (#195), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1173 |
Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 32.6 (#202), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1108 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.5 (#225), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1210 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | 1247 | 1109 |
| LMArena German | 1199 | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | 1095 |
Instruction Following C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.9 (#232), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1114 |
Long Context C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#215), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.4 (#230), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.3 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.