Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Phi-2
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has enough public results to be ranked (#216); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
MicrosoftSide by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | — |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.3 (#227), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | — |
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Reasoning Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 22.3 (#183), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.62 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 31.4 (#195), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 32.6 (#202), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Multilingual Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.5 (#225), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1210 | — |
| LMArena French | 1247 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.9 (#232), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#215), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.4 (#230), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Phi-2?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has enough public results to be ranked (#216); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Phi-2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.