Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 3 32b Think leads 49.1 to 42.2.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 38.7 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.6 (#172)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1319 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Olmo 3 32b Think: 25.9 (#140)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1302 |
Math Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Olmo 3 32b Think: 36.5 (#165)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1316 |
Knowledge Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Olmo 3 32b Think: 35.0 (#190)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1273 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.2 (#210)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1199 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.2 (#198)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1275 |
Long Context Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#182)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.1 (#193)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1290 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Olmo 3 32b Think scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 34.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.