Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads 50.8 to 42.2.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 37.9 (#186)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1296 |
Reasoning Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 26.2 (#135)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1311 |
Math Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: —
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | — |
Multilingual Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 41.1 (#211)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1253 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1277 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1269 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 68.3 (#189)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1293 |
Long Context Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 39.5 (#176)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1299 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1: 50.8 (#179)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1308 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1288 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1315 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 better for coding?
Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 34.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.3 Nemotron 49b Super v1 has 10.