Model comparison
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
NVIDIASummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b scores higher in 3 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 5 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 35.9 |
| Released | 2024-10-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.8 (#231), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1197 | 1223 |
Reasoning Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 23.3 (#180), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 23.5 (#177)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1193 | 1203 |
Math Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 34.0 (#197), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 34.6 (#193)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1200 | 1230 |
Knowledge C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 33.2 (#206), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.9 (#218)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1182 | 1167 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.9% | — |
Multilingual C4ai Aya Expanse 32b leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 38.4 (#230), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.1 (#241)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1213 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1211 | 1180 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1187 |
| LMArena French | 1248 | — |
| LMArena German | 1199 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1163 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1158 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1193 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 62.6 (#237), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 62.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1196 | 1201 |
Long Context Too close to call
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 37.2 (#220), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#230)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1228 | 1205 |
Writing & Preference Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b: 42.2 (#235), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.4 (#229)
| Benchmark | C4ai Aya Expanse 32b | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1224 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1200 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1190 | 1227 |
Frequently asked questions
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?
C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.9 vs 35.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is C4ai Aya Expanse 32b or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (34.8 vs 35.6); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do C4ai Aya Expanse 32b and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. C4ai Aya Expanse 32b has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.