Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen3 Max
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 Max leads 48.1 to 27.4.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.20 / $6 for Qwen3 Max.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 262K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 43.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-09-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 262K |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $1.20 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 33 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen3 Max: 43.0 (#93)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1456 |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 370.45 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 71.56 |
Reasoning Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen3 Max: 22.6 (#190)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1448 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 142.38 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 72.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 30.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 82.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 28.3% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen3 Max: 38.7 (#131)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1446 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 18.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 97.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen3 Max: 48.1 (#78)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1455 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 72.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.7% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen3 Max: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen3 Max: 53.7 (#62)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1429 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1478 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1449 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1463 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1397 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1399 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1428 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1462 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen3 Max: 74.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1419 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen3 Max: 41.6 (#134)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1438 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| CL-bench | — | 14.5% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 Max leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen3 Max: 62.4 (#76)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1439 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1402 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1446 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen3 Max?
Qwen3 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.7 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Pro costs 1.7× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3 Max?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Max lists at $1.20 and $6.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3 Max better for coding?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen3 Max share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Max has 33.