Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 27.4.
- Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper at $0.50 / $3 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Qwen3.6 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 47.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-03-31 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $3 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1449 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 147.65 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1454 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen3.6 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1455 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1432 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1425 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1439 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1438 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus?
Qwen3.6 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $3 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?
Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen3.6 Plus share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.