Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 28.5 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 131K.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 131K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 128.52 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 131K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.