Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen1.5-72B
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 27.4 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1148 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-72B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1164 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen1.5-72B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1110 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1141 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1160 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.0 vs 30.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5-72B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.