Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen1.5-110B
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 39.7 to 33.6.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 34.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-04-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 35% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 44.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1168 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1185 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1144 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen1.5-110B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1142 |
Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1158 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1160 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen1.5-110B?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?
Amazon Nova Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.1 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen1.5-110B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.