Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs phi-3-medium 14B
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 2 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 27.4 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 121.23 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 82% | 78% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | — |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Amazon Nova Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and phi-3-medium 14B share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.