Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
MetaSummary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.1 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Muse Spark 1.1 leads 73.4 to 43.9.
- Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 / $3.20 per million input/output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.1.
- Muse Spark 1.1 accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 49.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-04-08 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 10K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $1.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $4.25 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 37 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Muse Spark 1.1: 51.3 (#40)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 53.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1542 |
| SciCode | — | 58.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Muse Spark 1.1: 30.8 (#73)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 31.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 40.5% |
| GBAEval | — | 7.9% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 15% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 6,520 |
Reasoning Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Muse Spark 1.1: 47.1 (#44)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1486 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 154.21 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 84.9% |
| CritPt | — | 15.1% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 94.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 49.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Muse Spark 1.1: 45.5 (#76)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1483 |
| ProofBench | — | 39% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Muse Spark 1.1: 53.1 (#59)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1478 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 57.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Muse Spark 1.1: 42.6 (#29)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1293 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1465 |
Multilingual Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Muse Spark 1.1: 56.7 (#17)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1518 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1494 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1466 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1451 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1483 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1464 |
Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Muse Spark 1.1: 76.5 (#39)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1457 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Muse Spark 1.1: 44.8 (#58)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1462 |
Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Muse Spark 1.1: 73.4 (#11)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Muse Spark 1.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1479 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1437 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1485 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1927 |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1260 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Muse Spark 1.1?
Muse Spark 1.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.9 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Muse Spark 1.1?
Amazon Nova Pro is cheaper. It lists at $0.80 per million input tokens and $3.20 per million output tokens; Muse Spark 1.1 lists at $1.25 and $4.25.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Muse Spark 1.1 better for coding?
Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.3 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Spark 1.1 does, with 1.05M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.1 has 37.