Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Grok 4
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 27 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 27 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4 in 10 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4 leads 53.8 to 27.4.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 25% for Amazon Nova Pro and 63% for Grok 4.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 48.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-07-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 48 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Grok 4: 50.3 (#46)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Grok 4: 32.3 (#68)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | 63% |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |
Reasoning Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Grok 4: 36.7 (#65)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1409 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 146.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Grok 4: 48.4 (#64)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | 60.3% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Grok 4: 53.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | 72.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1415 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Grok 4: 33.7 (#94)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1210 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |
Multilingual Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Grok 4: 51.8 (#103)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1427 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1394 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1377 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1410 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1420 |
Instruction Following Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Grok 4: 79.2 (#5)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 81.5% | 94.9% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1387 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
Long Context Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
Writing & Preference Grok 4 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Grok 4: 58.5 (#116)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1397 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | 76.9% |
| WildBench | 77.7% | 79.7% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1416 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Grok 4?
Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Grok 4 better for coding?
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.3 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Grok 4 share?
27 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.