Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs GLM-4.6V

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

GLM-4.6V Z.ai (Zhipu)

41.3

Rank #137 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.6V in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.6V leads 56.6 to 43.9.
  • GLM-4.6V is cheaper at $0.30 / $0.90 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
  • Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 128K.
  • GLM-4.6V has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
ProviderAmazonZ.ai (Zhipu)
Noometry Index31.041.3
Released2024-12-032025-12-08
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K128K
Max output10K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.80$0.30
Output $ / M tokens$3.20$0.90
Results tracked3812

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), GLM-4.6V: 40.9 (#128)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Coding12701390
LiveBench Coding38.1%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), GLM-4.6V: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), GLM-4.6V: 27.6 (#115)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Hard Prompts12461368
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8—
LiveBench43.5%—

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), GLM-4.6V: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—

Knowledge GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), GLM-4.6V: 38.0 (#149)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Expert12111371
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
MMLU82%—

Multimodal GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), GLM-4.6V: 34.8 (#90)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Vision9801164

Multilingual GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), GLM-4.6V: 48.6 (#141)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Non-English12341359
LMArena Chinese12441425
LMArena Russian12401340
LMArena French1271—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), GLM-4.6V: 71.4 (#151)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Instruction Following12351352
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—

Long Context GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), GLM-4.6V: 41.3 (#143)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Longer Query12551358

Writing & Preference GLM-4.6V leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), GLM-4.6V: 56.6 (#137)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProGLM-4.6V
LMArena Text12591377
LMArena Creative Writing12121347
LMArena Multi-Turn12461360
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or GLM-4.6V?

GLM-4.6V is cheaper. It lists at $0.30 per million input tokens and $0.90 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.

Is Amazon Nova Pro or GLM-4.6V better for coding?

GLM-4.6V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and GLM-4.6V share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.6V has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper