Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Pro vs Falcon-180B

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Pro Amazon

31.0

Rank #281 Confirmed

Falcon-180B Technology Innovation Institute

32.2

Rank #260 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Amazon Nova Pro leads 43.9 to 29.1.
  • Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Amazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
ProviderAmazonTechnology Innovation Institute
Noometry Index31.032.2
Released2024-12-032023-09-06
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window300K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.80—
Output $ / M tokens$3.20—
Results tracked3816

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LiveBench Coding38.1%—
LMArena Coding1270—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard25%—
TheAgentCompany1.7%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Hard Prompts12461007
Epoch Capabilities Index123.8112.13
LiveBench Reasoning32.6%—
LiveBench Data Analysis48.3%—
HellaSwag—89%
LAMBADA—79.8%
LiveBench43.5%—
PIQA—84.9%
WinoGrande—87.1%

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
Omni-MATH24.2%—
LiveBench Math38%—
LMArena Math1252—
GSM8K—54.4%

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
MMLU82%70.6%
Humanity's Last Exam4.4%—
MMLU-Pro67.3%—
Confabulations30.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.1%—
GPQA (HELM)44.6%—
LMArena Expert1211—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—67.8%
BoolQ—89%
OpenBookQA—64.2%

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Vision980—

Multilingual Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Non-English12341000
LMArena Chinese1244—
LMArena French1271—
LMArena German1243—
LMArena Japanese1200—
LMArena Korean1203—
LMArena Russian1240—
LMArena Spanish1182—

Instruction Following Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Instruction Following12351047
LiveBench Instruction Following67.1%—
IFEval81.5%—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Falcon-180B: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Longer Query1255—

Writing & Preference Amazon Nova Pro leads

Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova ProFalcon-180B
LMArena Text12591054
LMArena Creative Writing12121089
LMArena Multi-Turn12461013
Short-Story Creative Writing60.5%—
WildBench77.7%—
LiveBench Language37%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Falcon-180B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Falcon-180B share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper