Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 19 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 1 category and DeepSeek-V3.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1 leads 60.3 to 43.9.
- DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper at $0.25 / $0.95 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Amazon Nova Pro accepts more context: 300K tokens versus 164K.
- DeepSeek-V3.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | DeepSeek |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 42.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-08-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 300K | 164K |
| Max output | 10K | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $0.95 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), DeepSeek-V3.1: 40.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1417 |
| WeirdML | — | 38.4% |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), DeepSeek-V3.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), DeepSeek-V3.1: 27.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1417 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 139.92 |
| SimpleBench | — | 40% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 53.2% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24.3% |
| ForecastBench | — | 58 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), DeepSeek-V3.1: 38.9 (#122)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1420 |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
Knowledge DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), DeepSeek-V3.1: 43.7 (#90)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | 5.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1405 |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), DeepSeek-V3.1: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), DeepSeek-V3.1: 51.6 (#106)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1400 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1411 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1378 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1337 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1405 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1431 |
Instruction Following DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), DeepSeek-V3.1: 73.9 (#110)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1400 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), DeepSeek-V3.1: 36.3 (#232)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1422 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 52.8% |
Writing & Preference DeepSeek-V3.1 leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), DeepSeek-V3.1: 60.3 (#98)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | DeepSeek-V3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1401 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1408 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1436 |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than DeepSeek-V3.1?
DeepSeek-V3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.8 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or DeepSeek-V3.1?
DeepSeek-V3.1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.25 per million input tokens and $0.95 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or DeepSeek-V3.1 better for coding?
DeepSeek-V3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.3 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Pro does, with 300K tokens against 164K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and DeepSeek-V3.1 share?
19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and DeepSeek-V3.1 has 27.