Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 35 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 35 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 1 category and Claude 3.7 Sonnet in 9 categories; 10 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in agentic & tool use, where Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads 34.1 to 16.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Reasoning: 32.6% for Amazon Nova Pro and 87.8% for Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Anthropic |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 39.5 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 38 | 58 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 40.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | 74.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1361 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 61% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 52.8% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 64.9% |
| GSO | — | 3.8% |
| CadEval | — | 54% |
Agentic & Tool Use Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 34.1 (#50)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | 30.9% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| Cybench | — | 20% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 43.6% |
| OSWorld | — | 35.8% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 60% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 18.6 (#277)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | 87.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1333 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | 74% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | 141.16 |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | 76.1% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 46.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 28.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 4.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.8 |
Math Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 37.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | 33% |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | 79% |
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1337 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 57.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 91.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 4.1% |
Knowledge Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 39.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | 8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | 78.4% |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | 14.7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | 60.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1321 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 79.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 33.7 (#95)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | 1169 |
| GeoBench | — | 68% |
| VPCT | — | 39% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.9% |
Multilingual Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 44.1 (#179)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1296 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1299 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | 1303 |
| LMArena German | 1243 | 1301 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1267 |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1311 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | 1298 |
Instruction Following Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 72.9 (#125)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | 81.3% |
| IFEval | 81.5% | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1352 |
Long Context Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 50.3 (#10)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1373 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 83.3% |
Writing & Preference Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Claude 3.7 Sonnet: 54.4 (#150)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Claude 3.7 Sonnet |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1314 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1332 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | 81.1% |
| WildBench | 77.7% | 81.4% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1339 |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | 59.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1412 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Claude 3.7 Sonnet?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Claude 3.7 Sonnet better for coding?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Claude 3.7 Sonnet share?
35 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Claude 3.7 Sonnet has 58.