Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Micro Amazon

30.4

Rank #294 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 29.6.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.035 / $0.14 for Amazon Nova Micro.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.439.9
Released2024-12-032026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output10K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.035$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.14$0.13
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Coding20.2%—
LMArena Coding1218—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard22.3%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LiveBench Reasoning25.1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1191—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
LiveBench Data Analysis34%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64
LiveBench29.6%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH21.4%—
LiveBench Math34.5%—
LMArena Math1206—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
MMLU-Pro51.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
LMArena Expert1184—
MMLU70.8%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1186—
LMArena Chinese1209—
LMArena French1238—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1154—
LMArena Korean1150—
LMArena Russian1185—
LMArena Spanish1225—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following48%—
IFEval76%—
LMArena Instruction Following1174—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1205—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1208—
LMArena Creative Writing1172—
WildBench74.3%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1178—
LiveBench Language15.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Micro lists at $0.035 and $0.14.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper