Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Qwen Turbo
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 26.9 to 15.3.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.05 / $0.20 for Qwen Turbo.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena French | 1238 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | — |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Qwen Turbo?
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Qwen Turbo?
Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen Turbo lists at $0.05 and $0.20.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.