Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Phi-3.5-mini
Amazon Nova Micro has enough public results to be ranked (#290); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 30.0.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.9 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 10K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1206 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | — |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Phi-3.5-mini?
Amazon Nova Micro has enough public results to be ranked (#290); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.