Model comparison

Amazon Nova Micro vs Mercury

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Micro Amazon

29.9

Rank #290 Confirmed

Mercury Inception

37.3

Rank #192 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Mercury in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Mercury leads 65.3 to 56.6.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Micro and Mercury specifications
Amazon Nova MicroMercury
ProviderAmazonInception
Noometry Index29.937.3
Released2024-12-03—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K—
Max output10K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.035—
Output $ / M tokens$0.14—
Results tracked329

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Mercury leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 30.0 (#289), Mercury: 38.1 (#164)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Coding12181323
LiveBench Coding20.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 21.9 (#125), Mercury: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard22.3%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Amazon Nova Micro: 16.7 (#289), Mercury: 16.8 (#288)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Hard Prompts11911284
Kagi LLM Benchmark—21.6%
LiveBench Reasoning25.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis34%—
LiveBench29.6%—

Math Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 24.9 (#252), Mercury: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
Omni-MATH21.4%—
LiveBench Math34.5%—
LMArena Math1206—

Knowledge Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: 29.2 (#231), Mercury: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
MMLU-Pro51.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
LMArena Expert1184—
MMLU70.8%—

Multilingual Mercury leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.7 (#234), Mercury: 41.7 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Non-English11861259
LMArena Chinese1209—
LMArena French1237—
LMArena German1192—
LMArena Japanese1154—
LMArena Korean1150—
LMArena Russian1185—
LMArena Spanish1225—

Instruction Following Mercury leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 56.6 (#267), Mercury: 65.3 (#220)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Instruction Following11741238
LiveBench Instruction Following48%—
IFEval76%—

Long Context Mercury leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#224), Mercury: 38.3 (#193)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Longer Query12061264

Writing & Preference Mercury leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 39.7 (#242), Mercury: 46.2 (#216)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroMercury
LMArena Text12081282
LMArena Creative Writing11721186
LMArena Multi-Turn11781283
WildBench74.3%—
LiveBench Language15.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Mercury?

Mercury is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Amazon Nova Micro or Mercury better for coding?

Mercury scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 30.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Mercury share?

8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Mercury has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper