Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs Inkling
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 39.5.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $1.87 / $4.68 for Inkling.
- Amazon Nova Micro accepts more context: 128K tokens versus 66K.
- Inkling has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 44.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 66K |
| Max output | 10K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | $1.87 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $4.68 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 41 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Inkling: 34.5 (#234)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |
Agentic & Tool Use Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Inkling: 29.6 (#85)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |
Reasoning Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Inkling: 40.4 (#56)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1451 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 148.54 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Inkling: 31.3 (#225)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
Knowledge Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Inkling: 55.1 (#49)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1465 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multilingual Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Inkling: 54.0 (#52)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1490 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | 1458 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | 1448 |
Instruction Following Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Inkling: 75.1 (#71)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1426 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
| IFEval | 76% | — |
Long Context Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Inkling: 43.8 (#86)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1434 |
Writing & Preference Inkling leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Inkling: 65.2 (#51)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Inkling?
Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 42× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Inkling's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Inkling?
Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Inkling lists at $1.87 and $4.68.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or Inkling better for coding?
Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Amazon Nova Micro does, with 128K tokens against 66K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Inkling share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.