Model comparison
Amazon Nova Micro vs GPT-4.1 nano
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4.1 nano in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Amazon Nova Micro leads 36.5 to 23.7.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Omni-MATH: 21.4% for Amazon Nova Micro and 36.7% for GPT-4.1 nano.
- Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.10 / $0.40 for GPT-4.1 nano.
- GPT-4.1 nano accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 27.9 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2025-04-14 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 10K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.035 | $0.10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $0.40 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), GPT-4.1 nano: 24.1 (#330)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1218 | 1306 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 8.9% |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 19% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.2% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use GPT-4.1 nano leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 22.3% | 33% |
Reasoning Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), GPT-4.1 nano: 8.5 (#349)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1191 | 1286 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 33.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 0% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 25.1% | — |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34% | — |
| LMCA | — | 5.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.62 |
| LiveBench | 29.6% | — |
Math Too close to call
Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), GPT-4.1 nano: 26.9 (#252)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 21.4% | 36.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1206 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 28.9% |
| LiveBench Math | 34.5% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 70% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), GPT-4.1 nano: 21.8 (#273)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 51.1% | 55% |
| GPQA (HELM) | 38.3% | 50.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1184 | 1272 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.5% | — |
| MMLU | 70.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Micro: —, GPT-4.1 nano: 29.2 (#113)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1063 |
Multilingual GPT-4.1 nano leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), GPT-4.1 nano: 41.6 (#205)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1186 | 1260 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1209 | 1270 |
| LMArena German | 1192 | 1288 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1154 | 1198 |
| LMArena Russian | 1185 | 1261 |
| LMArena French | 1238 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1150 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1225 | — |
Instruction Following GPT-4.1 nano leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), GPT-4.1 nano: 67.8 (#193)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 76% | 84.3% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1174 | 1267 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 48% | — |
Long Context Amazon Nova Micro leads
Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), GPT-4.1 nano: 23.7 (#296)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1205 | 1283 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 25% |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), GPT-4.1 nano: 40.5 (#243)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Micro | GPT-4.1 nano |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1208 | 1285 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1172 | 1260 |
| WildBench | 74.3% | 81.2% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1178 | 1277 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 946 |
| LiveBench Language | 15.8% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Micro better than GPT-4.1 nano?
Amazon Nova Micro is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.4 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or GPT-4.1 nano?
Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; GPT-4.1 nano lists at $0.10 and $0.40.
Is Amazon Nova Micro or GPT-4.1 nano better for coding?
Amazon Nova Micro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.5 versus 24.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-4.1 nano does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and GPT-4.1 nano share?
20 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4.1 nano has 38.