Model comparison

Amazon Nova Micro vs Claude Fable 5

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 327× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Micro Amazon

30.4

Rank #294 Confirmed

Claude Fable 5 Anthropic

66.8

Rank #5 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Micro scores higher in 0 categories and Claude Fable 5 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Claude Fable 5 leads 88.5 to 26.9.
  • Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.
  • Claude Fable 5 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova Micro and Claude Fable 5 specifications
Amazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
ProviderAmazonAnthropic
Noometry Index30.466.8
Released2024-12-032026-06-07
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output10K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.035$10
Output $ / M tokens$0.14$50
Results tracked3262

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 30.5 (#295), Claude Fable 5: 70.6 (#4)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Coding12181519
DeepSWE—69.9%
FrontierCode—53.5%
LMArena WebDev—1625
FrontierSWE—47%
SciCode—61%
GSO—78.4%
WeirdML—91.9%
LiveBench Coding20.2%—
MirrorCode—63.9%
ALE-Bench—2,041

Agentic & Tool Use Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 22.1 (#132), Claude Fable 5: 54.0 (#2)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
APEX-Agents—63.6%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard22.3%—
Remote Labor Index—16.1%
τ²-bench Banking—39.7%
PostTrainBench—41.8%
GBAEval—74.5%
GDP.pdf—30%
LMArena Search—1230
Vending-Bench 2—5,680

Reasoning Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 17.4 (#294), Claude Fable 5: 76.8 (#6)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Hard Prompts11911508
ARC-AGI-2—89.2%
SimpleBench—81.9%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—91.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—92.7%
ARC-AGI-1—98.5%
CritPt—28.6%
Chess Puzzles—41%
EnigmaEval—39.3%
EBR-Bench—39.5%
LiveBench Reasoning25.1%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—52%
DTBench—98.4%
LiveBench Data Analysis34%—
LMCA—61.1%
Surface Evolver Bench—95%
Bench to the Future 3—0.13
Epoch Capabilities Index—162.06
LiveBench29.6%—

Math Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 26.9 (#254), Claude Fable 5: 88.5 (#5)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Math12061519
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—87%
FrontierMath Tier 4—90.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—95%
Omni-MATH21.4%—
LiveBench Math34.5%—
FrontierMath Erdős—0%

Knowledge Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 29.6 (#237), Claude Fable 5: 62.2 (#25)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Expert11841534
GPQA Diamond—85.9%
SimpleQA Verified—70.7%
MMLU-Pro51.1%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.5%—
GPQA (HELM)38.3%—
MMLU70.8%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Micro: —, Claude Fable 5: 45.3 (#17)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Vision—1324
Blueprint-Bench 2—38.6%
Furniture Assembly—35.8%
LMArena Document—1496

Multilingual Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#239), Claude Fable 5: 57.3 (#9)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Non-English11861481
LMArena Chinese12091543
LMArena French12381505
LMArena German11921486
LMArena Japanese11541506
LMArena Korean11501488
LMArena Russian11851504
LMArena Spanish12251498

Instruction Following Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 56.3 (#272), Claude Fable 5: 78.6 (#8)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Instruction Following11741502
LiveBench Instruction Following48%—
IFEval76%—

Long Context Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 36.5 (#229), Claude Fable 5: 46.3 (#23)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Longer Query12051509

Writing & Preference Claude Fable 5 leads

Amazon Nova Micro: 39.5 (#247), Claude Fable 5: 75.9 (#5)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkAmazon Nova MicroClaude Fable 5
LMArena Text12081491
LMArena Creative Writing11721494
LMArena Multi-Turn11781504
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1943
WildBench74.3%—
EQ-Bench 4—1340
LiveBench Language15.8%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Micro better than Claude Fable 5?

Claude Fable 5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 66.8 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Micro costs 327× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Claude Fable 5's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Micro or Claude Fable 5?

Amazon Nova Micro is cheaper. It lists at $0.035 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Claude Fable 5 lists at $10 and $50.

Is Amazon Nova Micro or Claude Fable 5 better for coding?

Claude Fable 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 70.6 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5 does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Micro and Claude Fable 5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Micro has 32 scored results on Noometry and Claude Fable 5 has 62.

Related comparisons

Go deeper