Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Lite scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 27.8.
- Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.24 per million input/output tokens, against $2 / $6 for Qwen3.8 Max.
- Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 56.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | 1502 |
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1496 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |
Math Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1227 | 1499 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | 1507 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |
Multimodal Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | 1538 |
| LMArena French | 1237 | 1503 |
| LMArena German | 1229 | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | 1492 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | 1479 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | 1489 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | 1489 |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index. Amazon Nova Lite costs 29× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3.8 Max's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.8 Max?
Amazon Nova Lite is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.24 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 Max lists at $2 and $6.
Is Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen3.8 Max share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.