Noometry

Model comparison

Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Amazon Nova Lite Amazon

31.9

Rank #265 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.9

Rank #156 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 26.3.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper at $0.03 / $0.13 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.24 for Amazon Nova Lite.
  • Qwen3.7 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.

Side by side

Amazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderAmazonAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.939.9
Released2024-12-032026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window300K1M
Max output10K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.06$0.03
Output $ / M tokens$0.24$0.13
Results tracked347

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Coding27.5%—
LMArena Coding1239—
ALE-Bench236.25—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LiveBench Reasoning36.7%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1220—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
LiveBench Data Analysis37.2%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.64
LiveBench36.4%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH23.3%—
LiveBench Math36.7%—
LMArena Math1227—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
Humanity's Last Exam3.6%—
MMLU-Pro60%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.1%—
GPQA (HELM)39.7%—
LMArena Expert1201—
MMLU77%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Vision990—

Multilingual Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1208—
LMArena Chinese1225—
LMArena French1237—
LMArena German1229—
LMArena Japanese1153—
LMArena Korean1153—
LMArena Russian1216—
LMArena Spanish1226—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following54.1%—
IFEval77.6%—
LMArena Instruction Following1205—

Long Context Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1234—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

BenchmarkAmazon Nova LiteQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1229—
LMArena Creative Writing1197—
WildBench75%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1199—
LiveBench Language25.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.03 per million input tokens and $0.13 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Lite lists at $0.06 and $0.24.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 300K.

How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper