Model comparison
Amazon Nova Lite vs Qwen Turbo
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Amazon Nova Lite leads 27.8 to 15.3.
- Qwen Turbo is cheaper at $0.05 / $0.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.06 / $0.24 for Amazon Nova Lite.
- Qwen Turbo accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.24 | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 34 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 32.5 (#270), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 27.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1239 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 236.25 | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 19.3 (#260), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 37.2% | — |
| LiveBench | 36.4% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 27.8 (#247), Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| Omni-MATH | 23.3% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 36.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1227 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Amazon Nova Lite leads
Amazon Nova Lite: 26.3 (#259), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 3.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 60% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 39.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1201 | — |
| MMLU | 77% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 25.5 (#123), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 990 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 38.0 (#232), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1208 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1225 | — |
| LMArena French | 1237 | — |
| LMArena German | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1153 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1226 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 59.3 (#255), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 54.1% | — |
| IFEval | 77.6% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1205 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 37.4 (#217), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1234 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Amazon Nova Lite: 42.1 (#237), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Lite | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1197 | — |
| WildBench | 75% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1199 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Lite better than Qwen Turbo?
Amazon Nova Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Lite or Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo is cheaper. It lists at $0.05 per million input tokens and $0.20 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Lite lists at $0.06 and $0.24.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Turbo does, with 1M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Lite and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Lite has 34 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.